A sign consists of the signified and the signifier
If what is signified is love,the signifier may vary … it can be a “x “.a bunch of flowers,a poem.
Of course it may be misunderstood if two people come from different cultures/countries or even different parts of the same country with maybe a different form of Christianity,with an atheisitic family etc
Some people tend to see a meaning in an act or word that was not intended…if carried too far it can lead to paranoia…I can imagine writing a funny play based on such confusion
More from Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ferdinand de Saussure theorizes that a “sign“[clarification needed] has two parts: signifier and signified. The signifier is the form that the sign will take, whether it be a sound or image and the signified is the meaning that is conveyed.
Signifier: the word ‘tree’ = Signified: the mental image of a tree.
Charles Sanders Pierce analyzed sign systems and came up with the following: An Icon signifies by resemblance. An Indexical sign signifies by causal connection and finally, a Symbol signifies by learned convention.
- What Is Discourse? (iyjournals.wordpress.com)
- Semiotic analysis (joshgormley.wordpress.com)
- Signs and Language: A Universal Stop (roadtrafficsigns.com)
- Semiotics (jacksonrogersluxton.wordpress.com)
- 2. Semiotics: the Critical Analysis of Media (mj158.wordpress.com)
- Reading image (amicobane12.wordpress.com)
- Semiology (anywhereeyescansee.wordpress.com)
- Semiotics (ellagmediablog.wordpress.com)
I am reading two books by C Fred Alford about Evil.He is a very good writer and scholar with a wonderful mind.He is also influenced greatly by Melanie Klein and Wilfred Bion.
In fact I am really delighted because he talks quite a lot about thought and what makes us thoughtless and how thinking is related to emotions.And how breaking linkages in our minds is a defence which stops us from feeling painful emotion at the cost of deadness inside
This article is about Whistleblowers like Edward Snowden because it’s good and also I cannot find any articles about Alford’s life.
Here is a review of his new book but we can’t get it in the UK
It is about Emmanuel Levinas and the Frankfurt School.
This is very interesting and not too difficult…he gives a longer account than I have seen elsewhere.
I can’t understand fully but am drawn to it wondering about our problems now
A week or two ago I was thinking about thinking.There is more than one kind of thinking.Some kinds,like rumination, are often self destructive.Other kinds of thinking can turn one outside of one’s self and can become what I call “thoughtfulness”.And that is a a virtue.It combines awareness and caring towards others with standing back and considering what is best for them and ourselves.
Then there is what we might call ” blind thinking” which is totally self centred like the chattering voices in our head
I want that red dress,he’s nasty,I am fed up being at work. so long…………all going on underneath our consciousness much of the time.We may be unaware of it but it can affect us and how we act towards others.It’s childish,turned inwards and trivial.Can we stop it? I am thinking about that,,, not brooding.I mean,my mind is open and I hope some new ideas will come to help me understand this blind thinking
How can we see and not be blind in our thinking?How can we be wise?
- Thoughtfulness:Some reflections (complexnumberblog.wordpress.com)
- Thinking about thoughts (and why it’s good to cry) (rootswingsprettythings.wordpress.com)
- Thinking about what is called thinking [Heidegger] (complexnumberblog.wordpress.com)
- Thoughts Have Consequences (robertringer.com)
- Wisdom (nhooseinny.wordpress.com)
- Listen to Your Inner Wisdom (quinncreative.wordpress.com)
- Pondering Proverbs (kittyjonesblog.wordpress.com)
- Weekend Reflections … on a very good day. (wisenapkin.com)
- Simple Beginnings (tuesdaysdead.wordpress.com)
About the face in Levinas‘s philosphy.
This is a website in the USA.It has some good articles mainly relating to religon,spirituality,humanity and thought
From Paul Gordon
“In particular, Levinas argued that ethics is responsibility for the other, that this responsibility precedes knowledge and, moreover, has nothing whatsoever to do with reciprocity, that is I do not do something in order to get something in return. Furthermore, Levinas argued, it is this ethical responsibility which constitutes me as a subject, it is the meaning of my subjectivity. Ethics, in the very particular sense that Levinas gives it, is at the heart of psychotherapy,”
Gordon, Paul (2012-12-15). Face to Face (Kindle Locations 585-589). Paul Gordon. Kindle Edition.
Whilst I was doing this I might as well post this link as well.Lanzmann made a very good film and knew much more than Arendt
Filed under film, philosophy
A very interesting and disturbing discussion of books about Heidegger and Arendt.Heidegger’s silence after the war about the
And looking at the quote below it seems they lacked wisdom