Libraries of the ancient world

I am  just beginning to look at this subject

 

Please click here for the article

Advertisements

Semiotics:a sign has two parts

http://users.aber.ac.uk/dgc/Documents/S4B/sem02.html

A sign consists of the  signified and the signifier

If what is signified is love,the signifier may vary … it can be a  “x “.a bunch of flowers,a poem.

Of course it may be misunderstood if two people come from different cultures/countries  or even different parts of the same country with maybe a different form of Christianity,with an atheisitic family etc

Some people tend to see a meaning in an act or word that was not intended…if carried too far it can lead to paranoia…I can imagine writing a funny play based on such confusion

More from Wikipedia

Signifier

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ferdinand de Saussure theorizes that a “sign“^{[clarification needed]} has two parts: signifier and signified. The signifier is the form that the sign will take, whether it be a sound or image and the signified is the meaning that is conveyed.

Example

Signifier: the word ‘tree’ = Signified: the mental image of a tree.

Charles Sanders Pierce analyzed sign systems and came up with the following: An Icon signifies by resemblance. An Indexical sign signifies by causal connection and finally, a Symbol signifies by learned convention.

See also

Related articles

• What Is Discourse? (iyjournals.wordpress.com)
• Semiotic analysis (joshgormley.wordpress.com)
• Signs and Language: A Universal Stop (roadtrafficsigns.com)
• Semiotics (jacksonrogersluxton.wordpress.com)
• 2. Semiotics: the Critical Analysis of Media (mj158.wordpress.com)
• Reading image (amicobane12.wordpress.com)
• Semiology (anywhereeyescansee.wordpress.com)
• Semiotics (ellagmediablog.wordpress.com)

LITERARY OR POPULAR FICTION?

This  is  verygood.[I was just practising how to do a lnk there!I am  not fully trained in editing.]
This is an interesting article about the difference between literary and popular fiction.I have written a few short stories but always wanted to write a novel.
I love Nicholas Freeling.His  novels are written as detective stories but they qualify as literary fiction.I especially like,Dresden Green.
You can get a full  list of his novels via the link above.I shall be mulling over the thought of writing this weekend and looking a people walking by as I stroll along.
Why do we women wear such clothes?Why is “feminine” a bad word… like flowered dresses?How can one reconcile feminism with femininity?We don’t all want abortions like Simone de Beauvoir.
The other day I wore a dress and my partner said,Auntie E!

Not a compliment is it?I was wondering how good my imagination is.It’s based on experience

Related articles

• Amazon launches literary journal (theguardian.com)
• Guest DJ: Finding Literary Inspiration Just Outside Your Door by Chris Campion (heatherharlen.com)
• Novel Finding: Reading Literary Fiction Improves Empathy (scientificamerican.com)
• Literary News (he2etic.wordpress.com)
• True or False: Feminists Lack Sexuality (feministfalsehoods.wordpress.com)
• In Defense of Feminism, and in Rejection of Pseudo-Feminism (alstefanelli.com)
• Girls, Girlhood and Feminism (binarythis.com)
• Fashion and feminism (thessbook.wordpress.com)
• Women’s Institute’s new wave crafts its own politics in crochet and patchwork (theguardian.com)
• When a woman says she’s not feminist, we can do better than shout her down | Ruby Tandoh (theguardian.com)

Sad news for literature and languages studies

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/education/as-interest-fades-in-the-humanities-colleges-worry.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131031&_r=0

In the USA and in the UK  we find fewer people are studying the humanities.Here it is because of the economic climate.. people wish to study “useful” subjects.Literature won’t get you a job,perhaps.It only enables you to live better.Already in schools the study of Greek and Latin has almost gone.

Economics still gets students………. odd considering that economists did not forecast the recession but were up to their necks in mathematical models.Economicis not a science and cannot be.I believe it’s a branch of philosophy in a broad sense.

I admit I did not study what we called “The Arts” at University but most of my friends did.But I read poetry.I liked Auden greatly.I read all the great novels.I read Doris Lessing and Iris Murdoch.I read Evelyn Waugh/I even read Nabokov…. what a writer!And I read Shakespeare Plays.

But with the much higher fees,recession and other worries,fewer students will spend three years studying the humanities.Plumbing or Carpentry are better options

I am thinking of writing some new plays.

A  Fit Plumber’s Nightly Schemes

Witches astir.

Ham to let.

Sing Fear.

Make up for the Mind

A Midsummer Balls Up.

The Emptiest.

Please defreeze me,let me grow.

A man without limits

Much Ado about Hacking.

As you Recycle it.

Julius Seized the Emails.

Fool Us and Squeeze Us.

Twelfth Fright.

Hacked to Death.

The Blaming of the Guru,

Prospero Not.

http://www.debate.org/opinions/are-the-arts-too-elitist

http://theamericanscholar.org/the-decline-of-the-english-department/?key=55705194

Related articles

• Are you a good reader? Take Nabokov’s quiz. (michiganderspost.com)
• The benefits of multilingual education (tech.mit.edu)
• Literature in Digital Humanity (dh101.ch)
• Susan Sontag on Literature and Freedom (brainpickings.org)
• Task #2: The Scholarly Conversation (scsmith143.wordpress.com)
• Bill Martin- A Champion of Children’s Literature (vastimaginations.wordpress.com)
• Nabokov, part 2: The Answers and the Grand Experiement (michiganderspost.com)
• Hard-Core Literature Course (clarissasblog.com)
• I Never Speak Metaphorically (lareviewofbooks.org)
• Other National Literatures (cwlgroup4project.wordpress.com)